Is there a way to select a bunch of tasks with a Priority 1 and change them all to another Priority level, or so I have to do them one at a time?
Unfortunately, there's currently no way of bulk changing priorities of tasks which means we have to do it one at a time for now.
Thanks for the response, but :(
I wanted to change all my priority 1's to priority 2's... so it looks like that is a manual process?
Unfortunately yes :-( We'll look into implementing it in the future.
I'll just focus on getting them done!!!
Really hope this (multi-select and change priority) gets implemented.
Desperately need this feature (also bulk change labels), in order to quickly reprioritize tasks.
This is a really important feature as it's very time consuming to change priorities one by one...
+1, even if the default was 3 (not 4) then you have the option to make it higher priority, or lower priority.
This is the reason I have looked at other options. Todoist is a very good application with a glaring flaw regarding batch editing. There is much Todoist does well... I have to think there was an initial problem that led to there not being batch editing, almost like a fork in the road? From a non programmer's point of view, seems easy to pull batch editing off. I'm sure it is a monster problem, however.
Still, as a Todoist fan and user, I have to say, this really must be addressed.
+1 seconding this!
+1 - would love to see this added. As much as I love Todoist, I think this is one of the key areas it's lacking: bulk editing options for changing priority, task level, adding filters, etc.
Agreed... key annoyance. So much so that if it's not available by the end of the year, I'm changing to something else (Wunderlist? Suggestions?). Between this problem and the inability to sort filtered lists, It's simply too difficult for me to figure out what I should be doing first, what task is what (e.g., when I use "read notes" as subtask for many different lists, but cannot see what the parent is), etc. I thought the filter features would solve this, but without being able to bulk edit to add tags, e.g., it's not worth the time.
I agree with the last comment and I'm also looking for other solutions, it's incredible that bulk editing hasn't been implemented properly yet!
Lacking bulk editing is fine... Well, as long as you don't have a lot going on... When you have a lot going on, lacking bulking editing really sucks!
Number one productivity tip: don't have a lot going on!
That said, I have to think it is being worked on... Really makes no sense to only be able to bulk change dates.
I hope Todoist develops this quickly. I really like the Todoist style. I like it enough to be patient for a time...
+1. I agree. This feature really needs to be there
I also agree. I've had to abandon Todoist for the same reasons above. Poor bulk editing features, lack of sorting or grouping ability...
I love so much about Todoist - I keep checking back to see if they've made the updates! No luck though. :(
Hate to say it, but it is seeming more and more that Todoist's dev team is more interested in "fancy" updates (can you say location based reminders?) than often requested, solid basic features.
This really needs to be added! One of the first things I do in the morning is reorder my tasks based on priority. This takes forever because I have to do it for each task individually.
The following multi select options would make life much easier:
1. Multi select using SHIFT is currently implemented as in CTRL. That means multi select of 40 entries requires 40 clicks. With shift select the first and the last and the whole list should selected (Standard Windows behavior).
2. Multi Select and change the priority
3. Multi select all entries of one day with one click to move everything to another day
4. Multi select and indent (lower priority)
Multi select at all :-)
When reading through the forum you find multi-select requests a lot, answer is always that you might consider this in the future. It would be helpful to understand if there are plans on enhancing multi-select in addition with a rough timeframe.
+1 really need more bulk editing option
Well put, Thomas Schrenk. I just have one clarification to add. "With shift select the first and the last and the whole list should selected (Standard Windows behavior)." ... is also standard behavior on Mac OS, so makes this even more simple to implement (no platform differences here). Just as a side note, multi-select on Mac OS works with command ⌘ key... one at a time.
It's crazy that so many ppl write about these basic features and no one from the staff give us an ETA...
Also looking for bulk editing or batch editing... especially to update due dates. Thanks.
I also would appreciate this feature. David Trey wrote in May that they were looking at adding this feature in the future. David, could you please provide us any update, or know that there isn't an update? Thanks.
Unfortunately there's no update at this point reg. this option, but it's possible that we'll implement it in the future.
This would be a great add.
just to give some feedback, my team is currently on Asana. I see much to like about Todoist. But i have hundreds of tasks and the idea of editing them one at a time? i'd likely end up in the funny farm. So we stopped our investigation into Todoist at that point. Lots to like here, so when this feature is here, we'll be back to review again. But having worked at a software company, something tells me that if this was simple to do, it would be done by now. So maybe this will never come or only after a major update.
I've moved to another system that allows Bulk updating of tasks because it was such a headache for me in Todoist. It is definitely possible. I do it every day when I have to move and shift priorities because life or other projects get in the way. Things happen and bulk changes are required. :-)
As did I (re: Erin Cassell). At the end of last semester (December), I cancelled my premium subscription and took the plunge into OmniFocus when entering the 100s of tasks for the new semester. I tried pretty much every other task manager out there, thought that Todoist was "it", but then gave up on it. OmniFocus, although pricey, has been working very well for me thus far.
Good grief, after being faced with the task of editing a bunch of tasks separately, I am wearing down. Please, please update soon.
+1 (and bulk editing for labels as well)
+1 (and bulk editing for labels too)
Thanks for the response, David Trey. Personally, I am still actively missing this feature. Its lack is making Todoist much more challenging for me to use efficiently. The priorities of my tasks change over time, and I have hundreds of active tasks. Changing each task one by one is not an effective solution for me.
Given that bulk changes to priority do not seem to be a feature coming any time soon, do you have any suggestion for a workaround for those (apparently many of us) who need this feature for efficient task management?
With thanks for your support, John
Unfortunately, the only workaround for now would be to right-click on each task and change its priority.
Other than that, although it wouldn't really address this problem, you could try to never let many top priority tasks stack up until they lose their priority ;-)
Of course, we'll look into adding this option to our multi-select list of actions in future updates to address this.
I know you were trying to make a joke, but your response really bothers me.
For many of us, the priority of tasks are changed FOR us by other individuals on a regular basis. What was important to my customers or my boss yesterday may not be as important today. Wouldn't it be great if we lived in some utopia where we could sit down and knock things off of our list by order of priority. It happens sometimes, but on most days...it does not. I work in IT where things just happen. Systems go down and my customers need my help. In short...priorities change.
This issue and the fact that I cannot export my tasks (in a meaningful format) required me to move away from Todoist. Beautiful tool, but it is built for task management in an ideal setting which doesn't happen that often in the real world.
Erin, can I ask yoou which tool are you using right now? I'm testing different one, for sure I have to leave Todoist because of this (and other small but important problems)... (-1)
What really I don't understand is how is it possible that this thread is 1-year old and still they didn't address this fundamental feature (requested by many premium users)... (-1)
If we call this listening to their users!! (-1)
David, I was never being able to do what you suggest, we live in the real world (and we need real world tools not jokes about a feature requested by many 1 year ago)... (-1)
I agree with the other feedback. It really is disconcerting that this important and long-standing request has not been addressed .
Demetrio...I switched to Toodledo.
Tool is not as pretty, but it extraordinarily flexible and lets me define my task management workflow and not have it defined for me. It allows me to manage my tasks in the real world.
Heh, me too Erin.
Toodledo is ugly - but functional. It allows flexible fields, grouping, sorting, searching... I can make it work how I want.
Todoist is beautiful, and I love the look and feel of it, but ultimately, functional wins over pretty.
David, your answer sounds like the answer from Clyde Romo on March 26 2014. This is nearly a year ago.
Can you define the term future? Is this days, weeks, months, years, decades?
With the current implementation without multi-select the feature is not usable if you have lots of tasks and changing priorities.
When I see the features of the last updates I am reall not sure if features like iOS Widgets are more important than multi-select. For me the first is bells&whistles while the second is homework.
I like todoist, but it I lacks basic functionality. The tool is meant to increase productivity and should not create additional work.
Therefore it would be a great idea if you could increase the priority of bulk changing priorities :-) and give us a dimension on the timeframe.
Just to chime in again, if there are technical reasons why this functionality is very difficult to implement, or reasons where it would be confusing or contradictory in some functional way, that would be of interest. At least that would give us an understanding that at least some detailed assessment is underway.
this is absolutely annoying. No roadmap, no meaning answers, too much time to solve problems,... same main reasons I left producteev. now evaluating hitask and toodledo...
Thanks guys, I'll evaluate Toodledo...
Hello again, just as an update on the tests I'm doing: Toodledo seems flexible but the multi select is still complicate (you need to search first). It seems that producteev is much more powerful, anyone has already experienced both? Suggestions? Am I missing something?
Dem...almost my entire workflow in Toodledo is based on Saved Searches, so this is not an issue for me. I have a Saved Search call Work Overdue. First thing that I do in the morning is click on that saved search and then update all to today. It takes me literally less than 1 minute. Then, I can reevaluate all of my tasks for the day for priority and importance.
Saved Searches is the core of how the tool works for me...it is the main "screen" that I have up, so I can see tasks by projects, tasks by tags, etc.
I've never evaluated producteev, so I have no way to provide a comparison.
I agree with Laura, Toodle is ugly, but it does the job very well. I couldn't live without the bookmarklet that lets me save tasks from my email. Also, it offers import and export. I'll reiterate...it lets me manage my tasks using my workflow and doesn't force me into a workflow.
Love look and feel of Todoist...but the bulk update may cause me to go to ugly Toodledo...and leave ToDoist.... bummer
I couldn't stand it any longer. Omnifocus works very well. Expensive, :-S but after trying them all, the old adage, "you pay for what you get", holds true here.
Please, please implement bulk select -- coupled with both changes to priority and bulk drag-and-drop to different projects or to move the selected group higher or lower in priority.
It's not just about aesthetic beauty, it's about functional beauty: speed, seamless intuitiveness, and minimizing the number of steps.
Those are the attributes that ultimately drive consumers to love tech products, whether they be software apps or hardware.
You guys at Todoist could really win big if you understood that this is the SINGLE missing link in your otherwise superior product.