Is there a way to select a bunch of tasks with a Priority 1 and change them all to another Priority level, or so I have to do them one at a time?
Unfortunately, there's currently no way of bulk changing priorities of tasks which means we have to do it one at a time for now.
Thanks for the response, but :(
I wanted to change all my priority 1's to priority 2's... so it looks like that is a manual process?
Unfortunately yes :-( We'll look into implementing it in the future.
I'll just focus on getting them done!!!
Really hope this (multi-select and change priority) gets implemented.
Desperately need this feature (also bulk change labels), in order to quickly reprioritize tasks.
This is a really important feature as it's very time consuming to change priorities one by one...
+1, even if the default was 3 (not 4) then you have the option to make it higher priority, or lower priority.
This is the reason I have looked at other options. Todoist is a very good application with a glaring flaw regarding batch editing. There is much Todoist does well... I have to think there was an initial problem that led to there not being batch editing, almost like a fork in the road? From a non programmer's point of view, seems easy to pull batch editing off. I'm sure it is a monster problem, however.
Still, as a Todoist fan and user, I have to say, this really must be addressed.
+1 seconding this!
+1 - would love to see this added. As much as I love Todoist, I think this is one of the key areas it's lacking: bulk editing options for changing priority, task level, adding filters, etc.
Agreed... key annoyance. So much so that if it's not available by the end of the year, I'm changing to something else (Wunderlist? Suggestions?). Between this problem and the inability to sort filtered lists, It's simply too difficult for me to figure out what I should be doing first, what task is what (e.g., when I use "read notes" as subtask for many different lists, but cannot see what the parent is), etc. I thought the filter features would solve this, but without being able to bulk edit to add tags, e.g., it's not worth the time.
I agree with the last comment and I'm also looking for other solutions, it's incredible that bulk editing hasn't been implemented properly yet!
Lacking bulk editing is fine... Well, as long as you don't have a lot going on... When you have a lot going on, lacking bulking editing really sucks!
Number one productivity tip: don't have a lot going on!
That said, I have to think it is being worked on... Really makes no sense to only be able to bulk change dates.
I hope Todoist develops this quickly. I really like the Todoist style. I like it enough to be patient for a time...
+1. I agree. This feature really needs to be there
I also agree. I've had to abandon Todoist for the same reasons above. Poor bulk editing features, lack of sorting or grouping ability...
I love so much about Todoist - I keep checking back to see if they've made the updates! No luck though. :(
Hate to say it, but it is seeming more and more that Todoist's dev team is more interested in "fancy" updates (can you say location based reminders?) than often requested, solid basic features.
This really needs to be added! One of the first things I do in the morning is reorder my tasks based on priority. This takes forever because I have to do it for each task individually.
The following multi select options would make life much easier:
1. Multi select using SHIFT is currently implemented as in CTRL. That means multi select of 40 entries requires 40 clicks. With shift select the first and the last and the whole list should selected (Standard Windows behavior).
2. Multi Select and change the priority
3. Multi select all entries of one day with one click to move everything to another day
4. Multi select and indent (lower priority)
Multi select at all :-)
When reading through the forum you find multi-select requests a lot, answer is always that you might consider this in the future. It would be helpful to understand if there are plans on enhancing multi-select in addition with a rough timeframe.
+1 really need more bulk editing option
Well put, Thomas Schrenk. I just have one clarification to add. "With shift select the first and the last and the whole list should selected (Standard Windows behavior)." ... is also standard behavior on Mac OS, so makes this even more simple to implement (no platform differences here). Just as a side note, multi-select on Mac OS works with command ⌘ key... one at a time.
It's crazy that so many ppl write about these basic features and no one from the staff give us an ETA...